using your Truth Love Energy to learn how to choose, and to choose how to learn
I've been aware of the "absoluteness" of the 2D Cadre/Entity Casting Model for a long time, most especially the idea that all Traveling Companioins, i.e., those in our Cadre Cadence who all have the same Raw # have the same Casting. I've also been aware that the initial information that my daughter, SBF, was given is at odds with it. So, either the model is incomplete or the channeling was wrong for her. I finally decided to ask for clarification. The information seems to jibe with some of the other information we've been receiving about the 3D Model, which has yet to be delivered through a comprehensive session (definitely on the list for 2012). The following opens up a can o'worms and isn't entirely clear to me; so, I'll probably have to followup.
[GeraldineB] I would like clarification about my daughter, SBF's Role and Casting. When we originally got it, you said that she was a Traveling Companion to both her father, George, and me; yet, you gave her information as Server-cast Sage. If she has the same raw # as me, wouldn't she be sage-casted, too?
[MEntity] In response to your question about Raw Numbers and Traveling Companions: Raw Numbers are slowly beginning to be differentiated as Sequential and Position. Your Raw Sequence and your Raw Position. The Raw Sequential Number is what links fragments, not the Raw Positions. So while the 300th fragments may be linked, they may fall as any Position within a Cadence, because of the count of Positions
before them.
[MEntity] For entities that have no "wild cards," or have no missing Positions up to the point of the Sequential Number, then the Casting is going to be consistent. In Entities where there are incomplete Cadences resulting in Wild Cards, or where the count of Role changes over to a new count of a different Role, then the Casting Positions can be different, even if the Sequential Number is the same.
[MEntity] In your case, your "numbers" appear to be the same in both Sequence and Position.
[MEntity] We can elaborate upon this another time, and with more specific examples, but we must conclude here for today.
Public Wall

Comment by TROY on February 18, 2012 at 12:32pm @Ulla, I had just posted to the other thread about drawing conclusions too quickly, but this is one conclusion I can relate to! LOL
Comment by Ulla Sarmiento on February 16, 2012 at 6:38pm Thanks for this clarification. It seems we need to keep a flexible mind about these "models" that change over time. I've come to the conclusion that anything is possible...
© 2012 Created by TROY.
You need to be a member of The Michael Teachings to add comments!
Join The Michael Teachings